在线同伴互评为批判性思维的发展提供了新理论和技术手段,但批判性思维发展离不开同伴交互。同伴评价和同伴交互是在线同伴互评实施的活动主体。文章运用社会网络和认知网络分析方法,以交互性评语为分析内容,分别从时间维度和角色维度探索批判性思维在在线同伴互评中的发展过程。研究结果显示：（1）批判性思维在在线同伴互评中呈现进阶且连续的发展过程;（2）同伴交互是促进批判性思维发展的主要动力;（3）批判性思维在在线同伴互评不同阶段和不同群体中具有进阶性差异;（4）批判性思维具有四类显著的结构化形态。文章从在线同伴互评视角揭示了批判性思维的发展过程,为提升在线同伴互评质量和批判性思维发展水平提供理论依据和实践参考。
Abstract
Online peer assessment provides new theoretical and technical means for the development of critical thinking, and peer evaluation and peer interaction are the main activities implemented by online peer assessment. The article proposes a model of online peer assessment for critical thinking development around peer evaluation and peer interaction, uses social network and epistemic network analysis methods, and explores the development process of critical thinking in online peer assessment from the temporal dimension and role dimension, respectively, using the interactive comments as the analysis content. The findings show that (1) critical thinking shows a progressive and continuous development process in online peer assessment; (2) peer interaction is the main driver for critical thinking development; (3) critical thinking has progressive differences in different stages and groups of online peer assessment; and (4) critical thinking has a significant structural pattern. The article reveals the development process of critical thinking from the perspective of online peer assessment, and provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for improving the quality of online peer assessment and the development level of critical thinking.
关键词
批判性思维 /
在线同伴互评 /
同伴交互 /
交互性评语
Key words
critical thinking /
online peer assessment /
peer interaction /
interactive comments
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 教育部.关于印发《未来技术学院建设指南(试行)》的通知[EB/OL] (2020-5-12)[2022-8-11].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/moe_742/s3860/202005/t20200520_456664.html.
[2] [6][15] 张涛,张思,高倩倩,等.促进在线同伴互评中学习者批判性思维发展研究[J].电化教育研究,2022,43(6):53-60.
[3] 冷静,郭日发,侯嫣茹,等.促进大学生批判性思维的在线活动设计研究及可视化分析[J].电化教育研究,2018(10):75-82.
[4] Hovardas T,Tsivitanidou O E,Zacharia Z C.Peer versus expert feedback:An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students.Computers & Education,2014,71:133-152.
[5] 柳晨晨,于澎,侯洁蕊,等.在线学习中互动讨论模式如何影响学习者的批判性思维[J].电化教育研究,2021(3):48-54+61.
[7] Topping K.(1998).Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities.Review of Educational Research.1998,68(3):249-276.
[8] Çevik Y D.Assessor or assessee? Investigating the differential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students’problem-solving skills[J].Computers in Human Behavior.2015,52:250-258.
[9] Karabulut-Ilgu A,Yao S,Savolainen P,et al.Student perspectives on the flipped-classroom approach and collaborative problem-solving process.Journal of Educational Computing Research,2018,56(4):513-537.
[10][17] 钟启泉. 批判性思维:概念界定与教学方略[J].全球教育展望,2020(49):3-16.
[11] Murphy E.An instrument to support thinking critically about critical thinking in online asynchronous discussions[J].Australasian journal of educational technology,2004,20(3):295-315.
[12] Han G,McCubbins O P,Paulsen T H.Using Social Network Analysis to Measure Student Collaboration in an Undergraduate Capstone Course.NACTA Journal,2016,60(2):176-182.
[13] 马志强,管秀.面向多维关联的社会认知网络分析[J].远程教育杂志,2022(6):96-103.
[14] 周平红,周洪茜,张屹,等.深度学习视域下学习者协同认知建构历程的社会认知网络特征分析[J].电化教育研究,2022(9):99-107.
[16] Hwang G J,Chang S C.Facilitating knowledge construction in mobile learning contexts a bi-directional peer assessment approach[J].British Journal of Educational Technology,2020(1):1-21.
[18] 张涛,张烁,张思,等.在线同伴互评中群体认知的特征、网络与发展轨迹分析[J].现代教育技术,2022(9):82-90.
[19] Macnight C B.Teaching critical thinking through online discussions[J].Educause Quarterly,2000(23):38-41.
基金
2021年度教育部人文社科青年项目“在线同伴互评中学习者批判性思维发展模型构建与应用研究”,项目编号：21YJ880098; 2025年河南省科技厅软科学项目“人机协同视域下批判性思维进阶模型构建与应用研究”,项目编号：252400410029; 2025年度河南省教师教育课程改革研究项目“批判性思维教育融入师范生培养的内在逻辑和实践路径研究”,项目编号：2524004100292025-JSJYZD-034
